Yet Another Proof of the Strong Equivalence Between Propositional Theories and Logic Programs
نویسندگان
چکیده
Recently, the stable model semantics was extended to a more general syntax beyond the rule form. Cabalar and Ferraris, as well as Cabalar, Pearce, and Valverde, showed that any propositional theory under the stable model semantics can be turned into a logic program. In this note, we present yet another proof of this result. Unlike the other approaches that are based on the logic of hereand-there, our proof uses familiar properties of classical logic, and provides a different explanation of the reduction in terms of classical logic. Based on this idea, we present a prototype implementation of propositional theories under the stable model semantics by calling the answer set solver DLV. Using the same reduction idea, we also note that every first-order formula under the stable model semantics is strongly equivalent to a prenex normal form whose matrix has the form of a logic program.
منابع مشابه
Equality propositional logic and its extensions
We introduce a new formal logic, called equality propositional logic. It has two basic connectives, $boldsymbol{wedge}$ (conjunction) and $equiv$ (equivalence). Moreover, the $Rightarrow$ (implication) connective can be derived as $ARightarrow B:=(Aboldsymbol{wedge}B)equiv A$. We formulate the equality propositional logic and demonstrate that the resulting logic has reasonable properties such a...
متن کاملTruth Values and Connectives in Some Non-Classical Logics
The question as to whether the propositional logic of Heyting, which was a formalization of Brouwer's intuitionistic logic, is finitely many valued or not, was open for a while (the question was asked by Hahn). Kurt Gödel (1932) introduced an infinite decreasing chain of intermediate logics, which are known nowadays as Gödel logics, for showing that the intuitionistic logic is not finitely (man...
متن کاملForgetting in Logic Programs under Strong Equivalence
In this paper, we propose a semantic forgetting for arbitrary logic programs (or propositional theories) under answer set semantics, called HT-forgetting. The HTforgetting preserves strong equivalence in the sense that strongly equivalent logic programs will remain strongly equivalent after forgetting the same set of atoms. The result of an HT-forgetting is always expressible by a logic program...
متن کاملReducts of Propositional Theories, Satisfiability Relations, and Generalizations of Semantics of Logic Programs
Over the years, the stable-model semantics has gained a position of the correct (two-valued) interpretation of default negation in programs. However, for programs with aggregates (constraints), the stable-model semantics, in its broadly accepted generalization stemming from the work by Pearce, Ferraris and Lifschitz, has a competitor: the semantics proposed by Faber, Leone and Pfeifer, which se...
متن کاملReducts of propositional theories, satisfiability relations, and generalizations of semantics of logic
Over the years, the stable-model semantics has gained a position of the correct (two-valued) interpretation of default negation in programs. However, for programs with aggregates (constraints), the stable-model semantics, in its broadly accepted generalization stemming from the work by Pearce, Ferraris and Lifschitz, has a competitor: the semantics proposed by Faber, Leone and Pfeifer, which se...
متن کامل